首页> 外文OA文献 >Election polling errors across time and space
【2h】

Election polling errors across time and space

机译:跨时间和空间的选举轮询错误

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Are election polling misses becoming more prevalent? Are they more likely in some contexts than others? In this paper we undertake an over-time and cross-national assessment of prediction errors in pre-election polls. Our analysis draws on more than 26,000 polls from 338 elections in 45 countries over the period between 1942 and 2013, as well as data on more recent elections from 2014 to 2016. We proceed in the following way. First, building on previous studies, we demonstrate how poll errors evolve in a structured way over the election timeline. Second, we then focus on errors in polls in the final week of the campaign to examine poll performance across election years. Third, we use the historical performance of polls to benchmark recent polling “misses” in the UK, US and elsewhere. Fourth, we undertake a pooled analysis of polling errors – controlling for a number of institutional and party features – which enables us to test whether poll errors have increased or decreased over time. We find that, contrary to conventional wisdom, recent performance of polls has not been outside the ordinary. The performance of polls does vary across political contexts, however, in understandable ways.
机译:选举投票失误是否越来越普遍?他们在某些情况下是否比其他情况更有可能?在本文中,我们对选举前民意测验中的预测误差进行了超时和跨国评估。我们的分析借鉴了1942年至2013年期间在45个国家/地区进行的338次选举中的26,000多次民意测验,以及2014年至2016年最新选举的数据。我们采用以下方式进行调查。首先,在先前的研究基础上,我们演示了投票错误如何在选举时间表内以结构化方式演变。其次,我们将重点放在竞选活动的最后一周的民意调查错误中,以检查整个选举年的民意调查表现。第三,我们使用民意调查的历史表现来衡量英国,美国和其他地区最近的民意调查“失误”。第四,我们对民意调查错误进行汇总分析-控制许多机构和政党特征-使我们能够测试民意调查错误是否随时间增加还是减少。我们发现,与传统观点相反,最近的民意测验并非没有例外。但是,民意调查的表现在不同的政治背景下确实有所不同,但可以理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号